Déploie et exécute un modèle pour la simulation de la structure électronique avec un modèle de solvant implicite
Ce modèle, développé en collaboration avec la Cleveland Clinic, consiste en un flux de travail pour calculer l'énergie de l'état fondamental et l'énergie libre de solvatation d'une molécule dans un solvant implicite [1]. Ces simulations sont basées sur la méthode de diagonalisation quantique basée sur des échantillons (SQD) [2-6] et le modèle de continuum polarisable avec formalisme d'équation intégrale (IEF-PCM) du solvant [7].
Ce guide utilise le modèle avec une molécule de méthanol comme soluté, dont la structure électronique est simulée explicitement, et l'eau comme solvant, approchée comme un milieu diélectrique continu. Pour tenir compte des effets de corrélation d'électrons du méthanol, tout en maintenant l'équilibre entre le coût computationnel et la précision, nous n'incluons que les orbitales , et de paires libres dans l'espace actif simulé avec SQD IEF-PCM. Cette sélection d'orbitales est effectuée avec la méthode d'espace actif de valence atomique (AVAS) en utilisant les composants d'orbitale atomique C[2s,2p], O[2s,2p] et H[1s], ce qui entraîne un espace actif de 14 électrons et 12 orbitales (14e,12o). Les orbitales de référence sont calculées avec Hartree-Fock à coque fermée en utilisant l'ensemble de base cc-pvdz.
Introduction du flux de travail
Ce guide interactif montre comment charger ce modèle de fonction sur Qiskit Serverless et exécuter une charge de travail d'exemple. Le modèle est structuré comme un motif Qiskit avec quatre étapes :
1. Collecte l'entrée et mappe le problème
Cette étape prend la géométrie de la molécule, l'espace actif sélectionné, le modèle de solvatation, les options LUCJ et les options SQD comme entrée. Elle produit ensuite le fichier Checkpoint PySCF, qui contient les données Hartree-Fock (HF) IEF-PCM. Ces données seront utilisées dans la portion SQD du flux de travail. Pour la portion LUCJ du flux de travail, la section d'entrée génère également les données HF en phase gazeuse, qui sont stockées en interne au format FCIDUMP PySCF.
L'information de la simulation HF en phase gazeuse et la définition de l'espace actif sont prises comme entrée. Il est important de noter qu'elle utilise également les informations définies par l'utilisateur dans la section d'entrée concernant la suppression des erreurs, le nombre de shots, le niveau d'optimisation du transpileur de circuits et la disposition des qubits.
Elle génère des intégrales à un et deux électrons dans l'espace actif défini. Ces intégrales sont ensuite utilisées pour effectuer les calculs CCSD classiques, qui retournent les amplitudes t2 que nous utilisons pour paramétrer le circuit LUCJ.
2. Optimise le circuit
Le circuit LUCJ est alors transpilé dans un circuit ISA pour le matériel cible. Une primitive Sampler est alors instanciée avec un ensemble prédéfini d'options d'atténuation des erreurs pour gérer l'exécution.
3. Exécute le circuit
Les calculs LUCJ retournent les chaînes de bits pour chaque mesure, où ces chaînes de bits correspondent à des configurations électroniques du système étudié. Les chaînes de bits sont ensuite utilisées comme entrée pour le post-traitement.
4. Post-traite en utilisant SQD
Cette étape finale prend le fichier Checkpoint PySCF contenant les informations HF IEF-PCM, les chaînes de bits représentant les configurations électroniques prédites par LUCJ, et les options SQD définies par l'utilisateur dans la section d'entrée. En tant que sortie, elle produit l'énergie totale SQD IEF-PCM du lot de plus basse énergie et l'énergie libre de solvatation correspondante.
Options
Pour ce modèle tu dois spécifier les options pour générer le circuit LUCJ et les paramètres d'exécution SQD.
Options LUCJ
Lorsque le circuit quantique LUCJ est exécuté, un ensemble d'échantillons représentant les états de base computationnelle de la distribution de probabilité du système moléculaire est produit. Pour équilibrer la profondeur du circuit LUCJ et son expressivité, les qubits correspondant aux orbitales de spin de spin opposé ont les portes à deux qubits appliquées entre eux lorsque ces qubits sont voisins via un seul qubit ancilla. Pour implémenter cette approche sur le matériel IBM avec une topologie heavy-hex, les qubits représentant les orbitales de spin du même spin sont connectés via une topologie de ligne où chaque ligne prend une forme en zigzag en raison de la connectivité heavy-hex du matériel cible, tandis que les qubits représentant les orbitales de spin de spin opposé ne disposent que d'une connexion tous les quatre qubits.
Clique pour plus de détails sur les options requises :
L'utilisateur doit fournir le tableau initial_layout correspondant aux qubits qui satisfont ce motif zig-zag dans la section lucj_options de la fonction SQD IEF-PCM. Dans le cas des simulations SQD IEF-PCM (14e,12o)/cc-pvdz du méthanol, nous avons choisi la disposition initiale des qubits correspondant à la diagonale principale du QPU Eagle R3. Ici, les 12 premiers éléments du tableau initial_layout [0, 14, 18, 19, 20, 33, 39, 40, 41, 53, 60, 61, ...] correspondent aux orbitales de spin alpha. Les 12 derniers éléments [... 2, 3, 4, 15, 22, 23, 24, 34, 43, 44, 45, 54] correspondent aux orbitales de spin beta.
Il est important que l'utilisateur détermine le number_of_shots, qui correspond au nombre de mesures dans le circuit LUCJ. Le nombre de shots doit être suffisamment grand car la première étape de la procédure S-CORE repose sur les échantillons dans le secteur de particules correct pour obtenir l'approximation initiale à la distribution du nombre d'occupation de l'état fondamental.
Le nombre de shots dépend fortement du système et du matériel, mais les études SQD sur les interactions non-covalentes, à base de fragments et le solvant implicite suggèrent qu'on peut atteindre la précision chimique en suivant ces directives :
- 20 000 - 200 000 shots pour les systèmes ayant moins de 16 orbitales moléculaires (32 orbitales de spin)
- 200 000 shots pour les systèmes ayant 16 - 18 orbitales moléculaires
- 200 000 - 2 000 000 shots pour les systèmes ayant plus de 18 orbitales moléculaires
Le nombre requis de shots est affecté par le nombre d'orbitales de spin du système étudié et par la taille de l'espace de Hilbert correspondant à l'espace actif sélectionné au sein du système étudié. En général, les instances avec des espaces de Hilbert plus petits nécessitent moins de shots. D'autres options LUCJ disponibles sont le niveau d'optimisation du transpileur de circuits et les options de suppression des erreurs. Note que ces options affectent également le nombre requis de shots et la précision résultante.
Options SQD
Les options importantes dans les simulations SQD incluent sqd_iterations, number_of_batches et samples_per_batch. En général, un nombre inférieur d'échantillons par lot peut être compensé par plus de lots (number_of_batches) et plus d'itérations de S-CORE (sqd_iterations). Avec plus de lots, nous pouvons échantillonner plus de variations des sous-espaces de configuration. Étant donné que le lot de plus basse énergie est pris comme la solution pour l'énergie de l'état fondamental du système, plus de lots peuvent améliorer les résultats grâce à de meilleures statistiques. Les itérations supplémentaires de S-CORE permettent de récupérer plus de configurations de la distribution LUCJ originale si le nombre d'échantillons dans le secteur de particules correct est faible. Cela peut permettre de réduire le nombre d'échantillons par lot.
Clique pour plus d'informations sur la configuration des options SQD :
Une stratégie alternative est d'utiliser plus d'échantillons par lot, ce qui garantit que la plupart des échantillons LUCJ initiaux dans l'espace de particules correct sont utilisés pendant la procédure S-CORE, et que les sous-espaces individuels englobent une variété suffisante de configurations électroniques. Cela réduit le nombre d'étapes S-CORE nécessaires, où seulement deux ou trois itérations de SQD sont nécessaires si le nombre d'échantillons par lot est suffisamment large. Cependant, plus d'échantillons par lot entraîne un coût computationnel plus élevé de chaque étape de diagonalisation. Par conséquent, l'équilibre entre la précision et le coût computationnel dans les simulations SQD peut être réalisé en choisissant sqd_iterations, number_of_batches et samples_per_batch de manière optimale.
L'étude SQD IEF-PCM montre que lorsque trois itérations de S-CORE sont utilisées, la précision chimique peut être atteinte en suivant ces directives :
- 600 échantillons par lot dans les simulations SQD IEF-PCM (14e,12o) de méthanol
- 1500 échantillons par lot dans les simulations SQD IEF-PCM (14e,13o) de méthylamine
- 6000 échantillons par lot dans les simulations SQD IEF-PCM (8e,23o) d'eau
- 16000 échantillons par lot dans les simulations SQD IEF-PCM (20e,18o) d'éthanol
Comme le nombre requis de shots dans LUCJ, le nombre requis d'échantillons par lot utilisé dans la procédure S-CORE dépend fortement du système et du matériel. Les exemples ci-dessus peuvent être utilisés pour estimer le point de départ du benchmark du nombre requis d'échantillons par lot. Le tutoriel sur le benchmark systématique du nombre requis d'échantillons par lot peut être trouvé ici.
Déploie et exécute la fonction de modèle SQD IEF-PCM
# Added by doQumentation — required packages for this notebook
!pip install -q ffsim numpy pyscf qiskit qiskit-addon-sqd qiskit-ibm-catalog qiskit-ibm-runtime qiskit-serverless solve-solvent
Authentification
Utilise qiskit-ibm-catalog pour t'authentifier auprès de QiskitServerless avec ta clé d'API (jeton), que tu peux trouver sur le tableau de bord IBM Quantum Platform. Cela permet d'instancier le client serverless pour charger ou exécuter la fonction sélectionnée :
from qiskit_ibm_catalog import QiskitServerless
serverless = QiskitServerless(
channel="ibm_quantum_platform",
instance="INSTANCE_CRN",
token="YOUR_API_KEY" # Use the 44-character API_KEY you created and saved from the IBM Quantum Platform Home dashboard
)
En option, utilise save_account() pour enregistrer tes identifiants dans un environnement local (consulte le guide Configure ton compte IBM Cloud). Note que cela écrit tes identifiants dans le même fichier que QiskitRuntimeService.save_account() :
QiskitServerless.save_account(token="YOUR_API_KEY", channel="ibm_quantum_platform", instance="INSTANCE_CRN")
Si le compte est enregistré, il n'est pas nécessaire de fournir le jeton pour t'authentifier :
from qiskit_ibm_catalog import QiskitServerless
serverless = QiskitServerless()
Charge le modèle
Pour charger une Qiskit Function personnalisée, tu dois d'abord créer une instance d'un objet QiskitFunction qui définit le code source de la fonction. Le titre te permettra d'identifier la fonction une fois qu'elle se trouve sur le cluster distant. Le point d'entrée principal est le fichier qui contient if __name__ == "__main__". Si ton flux de travail nécessite des fichiers sources supplémentaires, tu peux définir un répertoire de travail qui sera chargé avec le point d'entrée.
from qiskit_ibm_catalog import QiskitFunction
template = QiskitFunction(
title="sqd_pcm_template",
entrypoint="sqd_pcm_entrypoint.py",
working_dir="./source_files/", # all files in this directory will be uploaded
dependencies=[
"ffsim==0.0.54",
"pyscf==2.9.0",
"qiskit_addon_sqd==0.10.0",
],
)
print(template)
QiskitFunction(sqd_pcm_template)
Une fois l'instance prête, charge-la sur serverless :
serverless.upload(template)
QiskitFunction(sqd_pcm_template)
Pour vérifier que le programme a bien été chargé, utilise serverless.list() :
serverless.list()
[QiskitFunction(sqd_pcm_template),
QiskitFunction(hamiltonian_simulation_template)]
Charge et exécute le modèle à distance
Le modèle de fonction a été chargé, tu peux donc l'exécuter à distance avec Qiskit Serverless. D'abord, charge le modèle par nom :
template = serverless.load("sqd_pcm_template")
print(template)
QiskitFunction(sqd_pcm_template)
Ensuite, exécute le modèle avec les entrées au niveau du domaine pour SQD-IEF PCM. Cet exemple spécifie une charge de travail basée sur le méthanol.
molecule = {
"atom": """
O -0.04559 -0.75076 -0.00000;
C -0.04844 0.65398 -0.00000;
H 0.85330 -1.05128 -0.00000;
H -1.08779 0.98076 -0.00000;
H 0.44171 1.06337 0.88811;
H 0.44171 1.06337 -0.88811
""", # Must be specified
"basis": "cc-pvdz", # default is "sto-3g"
"spin": 0, # default is 0
"charge": 0, # default is 0
"verbosity": 0, # default is 0
"number_of_active_orb": 12, # Must be specified
"number_of_active_alpha_elec": 7, # Must be specified
"number_of_active_beta_elec": 7, # Must be specified
"avas_selection": [
"%d O %s" % (k, x) for k in [0] for x in ["2s", "2px", "2py", "2pz"]
]
+ ["%d C %s" % (k, x) for k in [1] for x in ["2s", "2px", "2py", "2pz"]]
+ ["%d H 1s" % k for k in [2, 3, 4, 5]], # default is None
}
solvent_options = {
"method": "IEF-PCM", # other available methods are COSMO, C-PCM, SS(V)PE, see https://manual.q-chem.com/5.4/topic_pcm-em.html
"eps": 78.3553, # value for water
}
lucj_options = {
"initial_layout": [
0,
14,
18,
19,
20,
33,
39,
40,
41,
53,
60,
61,
2,
3,
4,
15,
22,
23,
24,
34,
43,
44,
45,
54,
],
"dynamical_decoupling_choice": True,
"twirling_choice": True,
"number_of_shots": 200000,
"optimization_level": 2,
}
sqd_options = {
"sqd_iterations": 3,
"number_of_batches": 10,
"samples_per_batch": 1000,
"max_davidson_cycles": 200,
}
backend_name = "ibm_sherbrooke"
job = template.run(
backend_name=backend_name,
molecule=molecule,
solvent_options=solvent_options,
lucj_options=lucj_options,
sqd_options=sqd_options,
)
print(job.job_id)
39f8fb70-79b2-43ca-b723-84e6b6135821
Vérifie le statut détaillé du travail :
import time
t0 = time.time()
status = job.status()
if status == "QUEUED":
print(f"time = {time.time()-t0:.2f}, status = QUEUED")
while True:
status = job.status()
if status == "QUEUED":
continue
print(f"time = {time.time()-t0:.2f}, status = {status}")
if status == "DONE" or status == "ERROR":
break
time = 2.35, status = DONE
Pendant que le travail est en cours d'exécution, tu peux récupérer les journaux créés à partir des sorties logger.info. Ceux-ci peuvent fournir des informations utiles sur la progression du flux de travail SQD IEF-PCM. Par exemple, les connexions des orbitales de spin identiques, ou la profondeur de porte à deux qubits du circuit ISA final destiné à s'exécuter sur le matériel.
print(job.logs())
L'appel du résultat du travail bloque le reste du programme jusqu'à ce qu'un résultat soit disponible. Une fois le travail terminé, tu peux récupérer les résultats. Ceux-ci incluent l'énergie libre de solvatation, ainsi que des informations sur le lot de plus basse énergie, la valeur de plus basse énergie et d'autres informations utiles telles que la durée totale du solveur.
result = job.result()
result
{'total_energy_hist': array([[-115.14768518, -115.1368396 , -114.19181692, -115.13745429,
-115.1445012 , -114.19673326, -115.1547003 , -114.20563866,
-115.13748344, -115.14764974],
[-115.15768392, -115.15850126, -115.15857275, -115.15770916,
-115.15801684, -115.15822125, -115.15833521, -115.15844051,
-115.15735538, -115.15862354],
[-115.15795148, -115.15847925, -115.15856677, -115.15811156,
-115.15815602, -115.15785171, -115.1583672 , -115.1585533 ,
-115.15833528, -115.15808791]]),
'spin_squared_value_hist': array([[5.37327508e-03, 1.32981759e-02, 1.36214922e-02, 8.84413615e-03,
7.26723578e-03, 1.94875195e-02, 3.03153152e-03, 6.07543106e-03,
1.04951849e-02, 5.36529204e-03],
[6.39397528e-04, 1.36814350e-04, 9.09054260e-05, 5.99361358e-04,
3.64261739e-04, 2.54905866e-04, 2.32540370e-04, 1.53181990e-04,
7.23519739e-04, 6.80737671e-05],
[4.53776416e-04, 1.63043449e-04, 1.05317263e-04, 3.82912836e-04,
3.41047803e-04, 5.18620393e-04, 2.06819142e-04, 1.17086537e-04,
2.32357159e-04, 4.26071537e-04]]),
'solvation_free_energy_hist': array([[-0.00725018, -0.00743955, -0.01132905, -0.0073377 , -0.00722221,
-0.01136705, -0.00719279, -0.01072829, -0.00733404, -0.00725961],
[-0.00719252, -0.00718315, -0.00718074, -0.00719325, -0.00717703,
-0.00718391, -0.00718354, -0.00717928, -0.00719887, -0.0071801 ],
[-0.00719351, -0.00718255, -0.00718198, -0.00718429, -0.00718349,
-0.00718329, -0.0071882 , -0.00718363, -0.00718549, -0.00718814]]),
'occupancy_hist': [[array([0.99712298, 0.99278936, 0.99083163, 0.97328469, 0.98959809,
0.98922134, 0.720333 , 0.25683194, 0.01939338, 0.02840332,
0.00946988, 0.0327204 ]),
array([0.99712298, 0.99278936, 0.99083163, 0.97328469, 0.98959809,
0.98922134, 0.720333 , 0.25683194, 0.01939338, 0.02840332,
0.00946988, 0.0327204 ])],
[array([0.9959042 , 0.9922607 , 0.99018862, 0.99265843, 0.98927447,
0.9900833 , 0.99403876, 0.00989025, 0.01120814, 0.01137717,
0.01152871, 0.01158725]),
array([0.9959042 , 0.9922607 , 0.99018862, 0.99265843, 0.98927447,
0.9900833 , 0.99403876, 0.00989025, 0.01120814, 0.01137717,
0.01152871, 0.01158725])],
[array([0.99590079, 0.99222193, 0.99016753, 0.99265045, 0.98927264,
0.99007179, 0.99407207, 0.00986684, 0.01125181, 0.01141439,
0.01150733, 0.01160243]),
array([0.99590079, 0.99222193, 0.99016753, 0.99265045, 0.98927264,
0.99007179, 0.99407207, 0.00986684, 0.01125181, 0.01141439,
0.01150733, 0.01160243])]],
'lowest_energy_batch': 2,
'lowest_energy_value': -115.1585667736213,
'solvation_free_energy': -0.007181981952470838,
'sci_solver_total_duration': 493.997501373291,
'metadata': {'resources_usage': {'RUNNING: MAPPING': {'CPU_TIME': 6.080063343048096},
'RUNNING: OPTIMIZING_FOR_HARDWARE': {'CPU_TIME': 1.999896764755249},
'RUNNING: WAITING_FOR_QPU': {'CPU_TIME': 6.2850868701934814},
'RUNNING: EXECUTING_QPU': {'QPU_TIME': 21.639373540878296},
'RUNNING: POST_PROCESSING': {'CPU_TIME': 495.40831995010376}},
'num_iterations_executed': 3}}
Note que les métadonnées du résultat incluent un résumé d'utilisation des ressources qui te permet de mieux estimer le temps de QPU et de CPU requis pour chaque charge de travail (cet exemple s'est exécuté sur un appareil fictif, les temps d'utilisation réels des ressources peuvent différer). Une fois le travail terminé, l'intégralité de la sortie du journal sera disponible.
print(job.logs())
2025-06-27 08:42:41,358 INFO job_manager.py:531 -- Runtime env is setting up.
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:45,015: Starting runtime service
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:45,621: Backend: ibm_sherbrooke
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:46,809: Initializing molecule object
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:51,599: Performing CCSD
Parsing /tmp/ray/session_2025-06-27_08-42-13_898146_1/runtime_resources/working_dir_files/_ray_pkg_4bc93dcc58c04b91/output_sqd_pcm/2025-06-27_08-42-45.fcidump.txt
Overwritten attributes get_ovlp get_hcore of <class 'pyscf.scf.hf_symm.SymAdaptedRHF'>
/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyscf/gto/mole.py:1293: UserWarning: Function mol.dumps drops attribute energy_nuc because it is not JSON-serializable
warnings.warn(msg)
/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pyscf/gto/mole.py:1293: UserWarning: Function mol.dumps drops attribute intor_symmetric because it is not JSON-serializable
warnings.warn(msg)
converged SCF energy = -115.049680672847
E(CCSD) = -115.1519910037652 E_corr = -0.1023103309180226
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:51,694: Same spin orbital connections: [(0, 1), (1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 4), (4, 5), (5, 6), (6, 7), (7, 8), (8, 9), (9, 10), (10, 11)]
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:51,694: Opposite spin orbital connections: [(0, 0), (4, 4), (8, 8)]
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:53,718: Optimization level: 2, ops: OrderedDict([('rz', 2438), ('sx', 1496), ('ecr', 766), ('x', 185), ('measure', 24), ('barrier', 1)]), depth: 391
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:53,736: Two-qubit gate depth: 94
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:53,737: Submitting sampler job
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:54,273: Job ID: d1f5j3lqbivc73ebqpj0
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:42:54,313: Job Status: QUEUED
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,813: Starting configuration recovery iteration 0
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,841: Batch 0 subspace dimension: 531441
2025-06-27 08:43:24,844 INFO worker.py:1588 -- Using address 172.17.16.124:6379 set in the environment variable RAY_ADDRESS
2025-06-27 08:43:24,847 INFO worker.py:1723 -- Connecting to existing Ray cluster at address: 172.17.16.124:6379...
2025-06-27 08:43:24,876 INFO worker.py:1908 -- Connected to Ray cluster. View the dashboard at [1m[32mhttp://172.17.16.124:8265 [39m[22m
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,945: Batch 1 subspace dimension: 519841
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,950: Batch 2 subspace dimension: 543169
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,955: Batch 3 subspace dimension: 532900
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,960: Batch 4 subspace dimension: 534361
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,964: Batch 5 subspace dimension: 531441
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,969: Batch 6 subspace dimension: 540225
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,974: Batch 7 subspace dimension: 524176
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,979: Batch 8 subspace dimension: 537289
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:43:24,983: Batch 9 subspace dimension: 540225
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:09,006: Lowest energy batch: 6
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:09,007: Lowest energy value: -115.15470029849135
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:09,007: Corresponding g_solv value: -0.0071927910374866375
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:09,007: -----------------------------------
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:09,007: Starting configuration recovery iteration 1
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,564: Batch 0 subspace dimension: 413449
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,572: Batch 1 subspace dimension: 399424
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,578: Batch 2 subspace dimension: 438244
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,583: Batch 3 subspace dimension: 422500
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,589: Batch 4 subspace dimension: 409600
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,596: Batch 5 subspace dimension: 404496
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,601: Batch 6 subspace dimension: 410881
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,605: Batch 7 subspace dimension: 442225
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,611: Batch 8 subspace dimension: 409600
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:40,618: Batch 9 subspace dimension: 405769
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:49:54,917: Lowest energy batch: 9
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:49:54,917: Lowest energy value: -115.15862353596414
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:49:54,917: Corresponding g_solv value: -0.0071800982859467006
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:49:54,918: -----------------------------------
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:48:09,007: Starting configuration recovery iteration 2
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,501: Batch 0 subspace dimension: 399424
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,508: Batch 1 subspace dimension: 412164
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,514: Batch 2 subspace dimension: 432964
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,519: Batch 3 subspace dimension: 400689
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,524: Batch 4 subspace dimension: 432964
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,529: Batch 5 subspace dimension: 418609
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,533: Batch 6 subspace dimension: 418609
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,538: Batch 7 subspace dimension: 425104
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,543: Batch 8 subspace dimension: 404496
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:50:25,548: Batch 9 subspace dimension: 429025
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:51:37,900: Lowest energy batch: 2
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:51:37,900: Lowest energy value: -115.1585667736213
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:51:37,901: Corresponding g_solv value: -0.007181981952470838
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:51:37,901: -----------------------------------
sqd_pcm_entrypoint.run_function:INFO:2025-06-27 08:51:37,901: SCI_solver totally takes: 493.997501373291 seconds
Étapes suivantes
- Consulte le guide sur la construction d'un modèle de fonction pour la simulation hamiltonienne
- Consulte les fichiers sources de ce modèle sur GitHub
Références
[1] Danil Kaliakin, Akhil Shajan, Fangchun Liang, and Kenneth M. Merz Jr. Implicit Solvent Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2025, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c01030
[2] Javier Robledo-Moreno, et al., Chemistry Beyond Exact Solutions on a Quantum-Centric Supercomputer, arXiv:2405.05068 [quant-ph].
[3] Jeffery Yu, et al., Quantum-Centric Algorithm for Sample-Based Krylov Diagonalization, arXiv:2501.09702 [quant-ph].
[4] Keita Kanno, et al., Quantum-Selected Configuration Interaction: classical diagonalization of Hamiltonians in subspaces selected by quantum computers, arXiv:2302.11320 [quant-ph].
[5] Kenji Sugisaki, et al., Hamiltonian simulation-based quantum-selected configuration interaction for large-scale electronic structure calculations with a quantum computer, arXiv:2412.07218 [quant-ph].
[6] Mathias Mikkelsen, Yuya O. Nakagawa, Quantum-selected configuration interaction with time-evolved state, arXiv:2412.13839 [quant-ph].
[7] Herbert, John M. Dielectric continuum methods for quantum chemistry. WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 2021, 11, 1759-0876.
[8] Saki, A. A.; Barison, S.; Fuller, B.; Garrison, J. R.; Glick, J. R.; Johnson, C.; Mezzacapo, A.; Robledo-Moreno, J.; Rossmannek, M.; Schweigert, P. et al. Qiskit addon: sample-based quantum diagonalization, 2024; https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-addon-sqd
[9] Asun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Banerjee, S.; Bao, P.; Barbry, M.; Blunt, N. S.; Bogdanov, N. A.; Booth, G. H.; Chen, J.; Cui, Z.-H. PySCF: Python-based Simulations of Chemistry Framework, 2025; https://github.com/pyscf/pyscf
[10] Kevin J. Sung; et al., FFSIM: Faster simulations of fermionic quantum circuits, 2024. https://github.com/qiskit-community/ffsim
%%writefile ./source_files/__init__.py
%%writefile ./source_files/solve_solvent.py
# This code is part of a Qiskit project.
#
# (C) Copyright IBM and Cleveland Clinic 2025
#
# This code is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. You may
# obtain a copy of this license in the LICENSE.txt file in the root directory
# of this source tree or at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
#
# Any modifications or derivative works of this code must retain this
# copyright notice, and modified files need to carry a notice indicating
# that they have been altered from the originals.
"""Functions for the study of fermionic systems."""
from __future__ import annotations
import warnings
import numpy as np
# DSK Add imports needed for CASCI wrapper
from pyscf import ao2mo, scf, fci
from pyscf.mcscf import avas, casci
from pyscf.solvent import pcm
from pyscf.lib import chkfile, logger
from qiskit_addon_sqd.fermion import (
SCIState,
bitstring_matrix_to_ci_strs,
_check_ci_strs,
)
# DSK Below is the modified CASCI kernel compatible with SQD.
# It utilizes the "fci.selected_ci.kernel_fixed_space"
# as well as enables passing the "batch" and "max_davidson"
# input arguments from "solve_solvent".
# The "batch" contains the CI addresses corresponding to subspaces
# derived from LUCJ and S-CORE calculations.
# The "max_davidson" controls the maximum number of cycles of Davidson's algorithm.
# pylint: disable = unused-argument
def kernel(casci_object, mo_coeff=None, ci0=None, verbose=logger.NOTE, envs=None):
"""CASCI solver compatible with SQD.
Args:
casci_object: CASCI or CASSCF object.
In case of SQD, only CASCI instance is currently incorporated.
mo_coeff : ndarray
orbitals to construct active space Hamiltonian.
In context of SQD, these are either AVAS mo_coeff
or all of the MOs (with option to exclude core MOs).
ci0 : ndarray or custom types FCI solver initial guess.
For SQD the usage of ci0 was not tested.
For external FCI-like solvers, it can be
overloaded different data type. For example, in the state-average
FCI solver, ci0 is a list of ndarray. In other solvers such as
DMRGCI solver, SHCI solver, ci0 are custom types.
kwargs:
envs: dict
In case of SQD this option was not explored,
but in principle this can facilitate the incorporation of the external solvers.
The variable envs is created (for PR 807) to passes MCSCF runtime
environment variables to SHCI solver. For solvers which do not
need this parameter, a kwargs should be created in kernel method
and "envs" pop in kernel function.
"""
if mo_coeff is None:
mo_coeff = casci_object.mo_coeff
if ci0 is None:
ci0 = casci_object.ci
log = logger.new_logger(casci_object, verbose)
t0 = (logger.process_clock(), logger.perf_counter())
log.debug("Start CASCI")
ncas = casci_object.ncas
nelecas = casci_object.nelecas
# The start of SQD version of kernel
# DSK add the read of configurations for batch
ci_strs_sqd = casci_object.batch
# DSK add the input for the maximum number of cycles of Davidson's algorithm
max_davidson = casci_object.max_davidson
# DSK add electron up and down count and norb = ncas
n_up = nelecas[0]
n_dn = nelecas[1]
norb = ncas
# DSK Eigenstate solver info
sqd_verbose = verbose
# DSK ERI read
eri_cas = ao2mo.restore(1, casci_object.get_h2eff(), casci_object.ncas)
t1 = log.timer("integral transformation to CAS space", *t0)
# DSK 1e integrals
h1eff, energy_core = casci_object.get_h1eff()
log.debug("core energy = %.15g", energy_core)
t1 = log.timer("effective h1e in CAS space", *t1)
if h1eff.shape[0] != ncas:
raise RuntimeError(
"Active space size error. nmo=%d ncore=%d ncas=%d" # pylint: disable=consider-using-f-string
% (mo_coeff.shape[1], casci_object.ncore, ncas)
)
# DSK fcisolver needs to be defined in accordance with SQD
# in this software stack it is done in the "solve_solvent" portion of the code.
myci = casci_object.fcisolver
e_cas, sqdvec = fci.selected_ci.kernel_fixed_space(
myci,
h1eff,
eri_cas,
norb,
(n_up, n_dn),
ci_strs=ci_strs_sqd,
verbose=sqd_verbose,
max_cycle=max_davidson,
)
# DSK fcivec is the general name for CI vector assigned by PySCF.
# Depending on type of solver it is either FCI or SCI vector.
# In case of sqd we can call it "sqdvec" for clarity.
# Nonetheless, for further processing PySCF expects
# this data structure to be called fcivec, regardless of the used solver.
fcivec = sqdvec
t1 = log.timer("CI solver", *t1)
e_tot = energy_core + e_cas
# Returns either standard CASCI data or SQD data. Return depends on "sqd_run" True/False.
return e_tot, e_cas, fcivec
# Replace standard CASCI kernel with the SQD-compatible CASCI kernel defined above
casci.kernel = kernel
def solve_solvent(
bitstring_matrix: tuple[np.ndarray, np.ndarray] | np.ndarray,
/,
myeps: float,
mysolvmethod: str,
myavas: list,
num_orbitals: int,
*,
spin_sq: int | None = None,
max_davidson: int = 100,
verbose: int | None = 0,
checkpoint_file: str,
) -> tuple[float, SCIState, list[np.ndarray], float]:
"""Approximate the ground state given molecular integrals and a set of electronic configurations.
Args:
bitstring_matrix: A set of configurations defining the subspace onto which the Hamiltonian
will be projected and diagonalized. This is a 2D array of ``bool`` representations of bit
values such that each row represents a single bitstring. The spin-up configurations
should be specified by column indices in range ``(N, N/2]``, and the spin-down
configurations should be specified by column indices in range ``(N/2, 0]``, where ``N``
is the number of qubits.
(DEPRECATED) The configurations may also be specified by a length-2 tuple of sorted 1D
arrays containing unsigned integer representations of the determinants. The two lists
should represent the spin-up and spin-down orbitals, respectively.
To build PCM model PySCF needs the structure of the molecule. Hence, the electron integrals
(hcore and eri) are not enough to form IEF-PCM simulation. Instead the "start.chk" file is used.
This workflow also requires additional information about solute and solvent,
which is reflected by additional arguments below
myeps: Dielectric parameter of the solvent.
mysolvmethod: Solvent model, which can be IEF-PCM, COSMO, C-PCM, SS(V)PE,
see https://manual.q-chem.com/5.4/topic_pcm-em.html
At the moment only IEF-PCM was tested.
In principle two other models from PySCF "solvent" module can be used as well,
namely SMD and polarizable embedding (PE).
The SMD and PE were not tested yet and their usage requires addition of more
input arguments for "solve_solvent".
myavas: This argument allows user to select active space in solute with AVAS.
The corresponding list should include target atomic orbitals.
If myavas=None, then active space selected based on number of orbitals
derived from ci_strs.
It is assumed that if myavas=None, then the target calculation is either
a) corresponds to full basis case.
b) close to full basis case and only few core orbitals are excluded.
num_orbitals: Number of orbitals, which is essential when myavas = None.
In AVAS case number of orbitals and electrons is derived by AVAS procedure itself.
spin_sq: Target value for the total spin squared for the ground state.
If ``None``, no spin will be imposed.
max_davidson: The maximum number of cycles of Davidson's algorithm
verbose: A verbosity level between 0 and 10
checkpoint_file: Name of the checkpoint file
NOTE: For now open shell functionality is not supported in SQD PCM calculations.
Hence, at the moment solve_solvent does not include open_shell as one of the arguments.
Returns:
- Minimum energy from SCI calculation
- The SCI ground state
- Average occupancy of the alpha and beta orbitals, respectively
- Expectation value of spin-squared
- Solvation free energy
"""
# Unlike the "solve_fermion", the "solve_solvent" utilizes the "checkpoint" file to
# get the starting HF information, which means that "solve_solvent" does not accept
# "hcore" and "eri" as the input arguments.
# Instead "hcore" and "eri" are generated inside of the custom SQD-compatible
# CASCI kernel (defined above).
# The generation of "hcore" and "eri" is based on the information from "checkpoint" file
# as well as "myavas" and "num_orbitals" input arguments.
# DSK this part handles addresses and is identical to "solve_fermion"
if isinstance(bitstring_matrix, tuple):
warnings.warn(
"Passing the input determinants as integers is deprecated. "
"Users should instead pass a bitstring matrix defining the subspace.",
DeprecationWarning,
stacklevel=2,
)
ci_strs = bitstring_matrix
else:
# This will become the default code path after the deprecation period.
ci_strs = bitstring_matrix_to_ci_strs(bitstring_matrix, open_shell=False)
ci_strs = _check_ci_strs(ci_strs)
num_up = format(ci_strs[0][0], "b").count("1")
num_dn = format(ci_strs[1][0], "b").count("1")
# DSK assign verbosity
verbose_ci = verbose
# DSK add information about solute and solvent.
# Since PCM model needs the information about the structure of the molecule
# one cannot use only FCIDUMP. Instead converged HF data can be passed from "checkpoint" file
# along with "mol" object containing the geometry and other information about the solute.
############################################
# This section is specific to "solve_solvent" and is not present in "solve_fermion".
# In case of "solve_fermion" the "eri" and "hcore" are passed directly to
# "fci.selected_ci.kernel_fixed_space".
# In case of "solve_solvent" the incorporation of the polarizable continuum model
# requires utilization of "CASCI.with_solvent"
# data object from PySCF, where underlying CASCI.base_kernel has to be replaced
# with SQD-compatible version.
# Due to these differences in the implementation the "solve_solvent" recovers
# the converged mean field results and "molecule" object from "checkpoint" file
# (instead of using FCIDUMP),
# followed by passing of solute, solvent, and active space information to "CASCI.with_solvent".
# This includes the initiation of "mol", "cm", "mf", and "mc" data structures.
mol = chkfile.load_mol(checkpoint_file)
# DSK Initiation of the solvent model
cm = pcm.PCM(mol)
cm.eps = myeps # solute eps value
cm.method = mysolvmethod # IEF-PCM, COSMO, C-PCM, SS(V)PE,
# see https://manual.q-chem.com/5.4/topic_pcm-em.html
# DSK Read-in converged RHF solution
scf_result_dic = chkfile.load(checkpoint_file, "scf")
mf = scf.RHF(mol).PCM(cm)
mf.__dict__.update(scf_result_dic)
# Identify the active space based on the user input of AVAS or number of orbitals and electrons
if myavas is not None:
orbs = myavas
avas_obj = avas.AVAS(mf, orbs, with_iao=True)
avas_obj.kernel()
ncas, nelecas, _, _, _ = (
avas_obj.ncas,
avas_obj.nelecas,
avas_obj.mo_coeff,
avas_obj.occ_weights,
avas_obj.vir_weights,
)
else:
ncas = num_orbitals
nelecas = (num_up, num_dn)
# Initiate the "CASCI.with_solvent" object
mc = casci.CASCI(mf, ncas=ncas, nelecas=nelecas).PCM(cm)
# Replace mo_coeff with ones produced by AVAS if AVAS is utilized
if myavas is not None:
mc.mo_coeff = avas_obj.mo_coeff
# Read-in the configuration interaction subspace derived from LUCJ and S-CORE
mc.batch = ci_strs
# Assign number of maximum Davidson steps
mc.max_davidson = max_davidson
####### The definition of "fcisolver" object is identical to "solve_fermion" case ########
myci = fci.selected_ci.SelectedCI()
if spin_sq is not None:
myci = fci.addons.fix_spin_(myci, ss=spin_sq)
mc.fcisolver = myci
mc.verbose = verbose_ci
#########################################################################################
# Initiate the "CASCI.with_solvent" simulation with SQD-compatible based CASCI kernel.
mc_result = mc.kernel()
# Get data out of the "CASCI.with_solvent" object
e_sci = mc_result[0]
sci_vec = mc_result[2]
# Here we get additional output comparing to "solve_fermion",
# which is the solvation free energy (G_solv)
g_solv = mc.with_solvent.e
#####################################################
# The remainder of the code in solve_solvent is nearly identical to solve_fermion code.
# However, there are two exceptions in "solve_solvent":
# 1) The dm2 is currently not computed, but can be included if needed
# 2) e_sci is directly output as the result of CASCI.with_solvent object.
# Hence, the two following lines of code are not present in "solve_solvent"
# comparing to the "solve_fermion" code:
# dm2 = myci.make_rdm2(sci_vec, norb, (num_up, num_dn))
# e_sci = np.einsum("pr,pr->", dm1, hcore) + 0.5 * np.einsum("prqs,prqs->", dm2, eri)
# Calculate the avg occupancy of each orbital
dm1 = myci.make_rdm1s(sci_vec, ncas, (num_up, num_dn))
avg_occupancy = [np.diagonal(dm1[0]), np.diagonal(dm1[1])]
# Compute total spin
spin_squared = myci.spin_square(sci_vec, ncas, (num_up, num_dn))[0]
# Convert the PySCF SCIVector to internal format. We access a private field here,
# so we assert that we expect the SCIVector output from kernel_fixed_space to
# have its _strs field populated with alpha and beta strings.
assert isinstance(sci_vec._strs[0], np.ndarray) and isinstance(sci_vec._strs[1], np.ndarray)
assert sci_vec.shape == (len(sci_vec._strs[0]), len(sci_vec._strs[1]))
sci_state = SCIState(
amplitudes=np.array(sci_vec),
ci_strs_a=sci_vec._strs[0],
ci_strs_b=sci_vec._strs[1],
)
return e_sci, sci_state, avg_occupancy, spin_squared, g_solv
%%writefile ./source_files/sqc_pcm_entrypoint.py
# This code is part of a Qiskit project.
#
# (C) Copyright IBM and Cleveland Clinic 2025
#
# This code is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. You may
# obtain a copy of this license in the LICENSE.txt file in the root directory
# of this source tree or at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
#
# Any modifications or derivative works of this code must retain this
# copyright notice, and modified files need to carry a notice indicating
# that they have been altered from the originals.
"""
SQD-PCM Function Template source code.
"""
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
from datetime import datetime
import os
import sys
import json
import logging
import time
import traceback
import numpy as np
import ffsim
from pyscf import gto, scf, mcscf, ao2mo, tools, cc
from pyscf.lib import chkfile
from pyscf.mcscf import avas
from pyscf.solvent import pcm
from qiskit import QuantumCircuit, QuantumRegister
from qiskit.transpiler.preset_passmanagers import generate_preset_pass_manager
from qiskit.primitives import BackendSamplerV2
from qiskit_addon_sqd.counts import counts_to_arrays
from qiskit_addon_sqd.configuration_recovery import recover_configurations
from qiskit_addon_sqd.fermion import bitstring_matrix_to_ci_strs
from qiskit_addon_sqd.subsampling import postselect_and_subsample
from qiskit_ibm_runtime import QiskitRuntimeService, SamplerV2
from qiskit_serverless import get_arguments, save_result, distribute_task, get, update_status, Job
current_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
sys.path.insert(0, current_dir)
from solve_solvent import solve_solvent # pylint: disable=wrong-import-position
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def run_function(
backend_name: str,
molecule: dict,
solvent_options: dict,
sqd_options: dict,
lucj_options: dict | None = None,
**kwargs,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""
Main entry point for the SQD-PCM (Polarizable Continuum Model) workflow.
This function encapsulates the end-to-end execution of the algorithm.
Args:
backend_name: Identifier for the target backend, required for all
workflows that access IBM Quantum hardware.
molecule: dictionary with molecule information:
- "atom" (str): required field, follows pyscf specification for atomic geometry.
For example, for methanol the value would be::
'''
O -0.04559 -0.75076 -0.00000;
C -0.04844 0.65398 -0.00000;
H 0.85330 -1.05128 -0.00000;
H -1.08779 0.98076 -0.00000;
H 0.44171 1.06337 0.88811;
H 0.44171 1.06337 -0.88811;
'''
- "number_of_active_orb" (int): required field
- "number_of_active_alpha_elec" (int): required field
- "number_of_active_beta_elec" (int): required field
- "basis" (str): optional field, default is "sto-3g"
- "verbosity" (int): optional field, default is 0
- "charge" (int): optional field, default is 0
- "spin" (int): optional field, default is 0
- "avas_selection" (list[str] | None): optional field, default is None
solvent_options: dictionary with solvent options information:
- "method" (str): required field. Method for computing solvent reaction field
for the PCM. Accepted values are: "IEF-PCM", "COSMO",
"C-PCM", "SS(V)PE", see https://manual.q-chem.com/5.4/topic_pcm-em.html
- "eps" (float): required field. Dielectric constant of the solvent in the PCM.
sqd_options: dictionary with sqd options information:
- "sqd_iterations" (int): required field.
- "number_of_batches" (int): required field.
- "samples_per_batch" (int): required field.
- "max_davidson_cycles" (int): required field.
lucj_options: optional dictionary with lucj options information:
- "optimization_level" (int): optional field, default is 2
- "initial_layout" (list[int]): optional field, default is None
- "dynamical_decoupling" (bool): optional field, default is True
- "twirling" (bool): optional field, default is True
- "number_of_shots" (int): optional field, default is 10000
**kwargs
Optional keyword arguments to customize behavior. Existing kwargs include:
- "files_name" (str): optional name for output files (enabled for local testing)
- "testing_backend" (FakeBackendV2): optional fake backend instance to bypass
qiskit runtime service instantiation (enabled for local testing)
- "count_dict_file_name" (str): path to a count dict file to bypass primitive
execution and jump directly to SQD section (enabled for local testing)
Returns:
The function should return the execution results as a dictionary with string keys.
This is to ensure compatibility with ``qiskit_serverless.save_result``.
"""
# Preparation Step: Input validation.
# Do this at the top of the function definition so it fails early if any required
# arguments are missing or invalid.
# Molecule parsing
# Required:
geo = molecule["atom"]
num_active_orb = molecule["number_of_active_orb"]
num_active_alpha = molecule["number_of_active_alpha_elec"]
num_active_beta = molecule["number_of_active_beta_elec"]
# Optional:
input_basis = molecule.get("basis", "sto-3g")
input_verbosity = molecule.get("verbosity", 0)
input_charge = molecule.get("charge", 0)
input_spin = molecule.get("spin", 0)
myavas = molecule.get("avas_selection", None)
# Solvent options parsing
myeps = solvent_options["eps"]
mymethod = solvent_options["method"]
# LUCJ options parsing
if lucj_options is None:
lucj_options = {}
opt_level = lucj_options.get("optimization_level", 2)
initial_layout = lucj_options.get("initial_layout", None)
use_dd = lucj_options.get("dynamical_decoupling", True)
use_twirling = lucj_options.get("twirling", True)
num_shots = lucj_options.get("number_of_shots", True)
# SQD options parsing
iterations = sqd_options["sqd_iterations"]
n_batches = sqd_options["number_of_batches"]
samples_per_batch = sqd_options["samples_per_batch"]
max_davidson_cycles = sqd_options["max_davidson_cycles"]
# kwarg parsing (local testing)
testing_backend = kwargs.get("testing_backend", None)
count_dict_file_name = kwargs.get("count_dict_file_name", None)
files_name = kwargs.get("files_name", datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S"))
output_path = Path.cwd() / "output_sqd_pcm"
output_path.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
datafiles_name = str(output_path) + "/" + files_name
# --
# Preparation Step: Qiskit Runtime & primitive configuration for
# execution on IBM Quantum hardware.
if testing_backend is None:
# Initialize Qiskit Runtime Service
logger.info("Starting runtime service")
service = QiskitRuntimeService(
channel=os.environ["QISKIT_IBM_CHANNEL"],
instance=os.environ["IBM_CLOUD_INSTANCE"],
token=os.environ["your-API_KEY"], # Use the 44-character API_KEY you created and saved from the IBM Quantum Platform Home dashboard
)
backend = service.backend(backend_name)
logger.info(f"Backend: {backend.name}")
# Set up sampler and corresponding options
sampler = SamplerV2(backend)
sampler.options.dynamical_decoupling.enable = use_dd
sampler.options.twirling.enable_measure = False
sampler.options.twirling.enable_gates = use_twirling
sampler.options.default_shots = num_shots
else:
backend = testing_backend
logger.info(f"Testing backend: {backend.name}")
# Set up backend sampler.
# This doesn't allow running with twirling and dd
sampler = BackendSamplerV2(backend=testing_backend)
# Once the preparation steps are completed, the algorithm can be structured following a
# Qiskit Pattern workflow:
# https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/intro-to-patterns
# --
# Step 1: Map
# In this step, input arguments are used to construct relevant quantum circuits and operators
start_mapping = time.time()
update_status(Job.MAPPING)
# Initialize the molecule object (pyscf)
logger.info("Initializing molecule object")
mol = gto.Mole()
mol.build(
atom=geo,
basis=input_basis,
verbose=input_verbosity,
charge=input_charge,
spin=input_spin,
symmetry=False,
) # Not tested for symmetry calculations
cm = pcm.PCM(mol)
cm.eps = myeps
cm.method = mymethod
mf = scf.RHF(mol).PCM(cm)
# Generation of checkpoint file for the solute and solvent
# which will be used reused in all subsequent sections
checkpoint_file_name = str(datafiles_name + ".chk")
mf.chkfile = checkpoint_file_name
mf.kernel()
# Read-in the information about the molecule
mol = chkfile.load_mol(checkpoint_file_name)
# Read-in RHF data
scf_result_dic = chkfile.load(checkpoint_file_name, "scf")
mf = scf.RHF(mol)
mf.__dict__.update(scf_result_dic)
# LUCJ uses isolated solute
mf.kernel()
# Initialize orbital selection based on user input
if myavas is not None:
orbs = myavas
avas_out = avas.AVAS(mf, orbs, with_iao=True)
avas_out.kernel()
ncas, nelecas = (avas_out.ncas, avas_out.nelecas)
else:
ncas = num_active_orb
nelecas = (
num_active_alpha,
num_active_beta,
)
# LUCJ Step:
# Generate active space
mc = mcscf.CASCI(mf, ncas=ncas, nelecas=nelecas)
if myavas is not None:
mc.mo_coeff = avas_out.mo_coeff
mc.batch = None
# Reliable and most convenient way to do the CCSD on only the active space
# is to create the FCIDUMP file and then run the CCSD calculation only on the
# orbitals stored in the FCIDUMP file.
h1e_cas, ecore = mc.get_h1eff()
h2e_cas = ao2mo.restore(1, mc.get_h2eff(), mc.ncas)
fcidump_file_name = str(datafiles_name + ".fcidump.txt")
tools.fcidump.from_integrals(
fcidump_file_name,
h1e_cas,
h2e_cas,
ncas,
nelecas,
nuc=ecore,
ms=0,
orbsym=[1] * ncas,
)
logger.info("Performing CCSD")
# Read FCIDUMP and perform CCSD on only active space
mf_as = tools.fcidump.to_scf(fcidump_file_name)
mf_as.kernel()
mc_cc = cc.CCSD(mf_as)
mc_cc.kernel()
mc_cc.t1 # pylint: disable=pointless-statement
t2 = mc_cc.t2
n_reps = 2
norb = ncas
if myavas is not None:
nelec = (int(nelecas / 2), int(nelecas / 2))
else:
nelec = nelecas
alpha_alpha_indices = [(p, p + 1) for p in range(norb - 1)]
alpha_beta_indices = [(p, p) for p in range(0, norb, 4)]
logger.info(f"Same spin orbital connections: {alpha_alpha_indices}")
logger.info(f"Opposite spin orbital connections: {alpha_beta_indices}")
# Construct LUCJ op
ucj_op = ffsim.UCJOpSpinBalanced.from_t_amplitudes(
t2, n_reps=n_reps, interaction_pairs=(alpha_alpha_indices, alpha_beta_indices)
)
# Construct circuit
qubits = QuantumRegister(2 * norb, name="q")
circuit = QuantumCircuit(qubits)
circuit.append(ffsim.qiskit.PrepareHartreeFockJW(norb, nelec), qubits)
circuit.append(ffsim.qiskit.UCJOpSpinBalancedJW(ucj_op), qubits)
circuit.measure_all()
end_mapping = time.time()
# --
# Step 2: Optimize
# Transpile circuits to match ISA
start_optimizing = time.time()
update_status(Job.OPTIMIZING_HARDWARE)
pass_manager = generate_preset_pass_manager(
optimization_level=opt_level,
backend=backend,
initial_layout=initial_layout,
)
pass_manager.pre_init = ffsim.qiskit.PRE_INIT
transpiled = pass_manager.run(circuit)
end_optimizing = time.time()
logger.info(
f"Optimization level: {opt_level}, ops: {transpiled.count_ops()}, depth: {transpiled.depth()}"
)
two_q_depth = transpiled.depth(lambda x: x.operation.num_qubits == 2)
logger.info(f"Two-qubit gate depth: {two_q_depth}")
# --
# Step 3: Execute on Hardware
# Submit the underlying Sampler job. Note that this is not the
# actual function job.
if count_dict_file_name is None:
# Submit the LUCJ job
logger.info("Submitting sampler job")
job = sampler.run([transpiled])
logger.info(f"Job ID: {job.job_id()}")
logger.info(f"Job Status: {job.status()}")
start_waiting_qpu = time.time()
while job.status() == "QUEUED":
update_status(Job.WAITING_QPU)
time.sleep(5)
end_waiting_qpu = time.time()
update_status(Job.EXECUTING_QPU)
# Wait until job is complete
result = job.result()
end_executing_qpu = time.time()
pub_result = result[0]
counts_dict = pub_result.data.meas.get_counts()
waiting_qpu_time = end_waiting_qpu - start_waiting_qpu
executing_qpu_time = end_executing_qpu - end_waiting_qpu
else:
# read LUCJ samples from count_dict
logger.info("Skipping sampler, loading counts dict from file")
with open(count_dict_file_name, "r") as file:
count_dict_string = file.read().replace("\n", "")
counts_dict = json.loads(count_dict_string.replace("'", '"'))
waiting_qpu_time = 0
executing_qpu_time = 0
# --
# Step 4: Post-process
start_pp = time.time()
update_status(Job.POST_PROCESSING)
# SQD-PCM section
start = time.time()
# Orbitals, electron, and spin initialization
num_orbitals = ncas
if myavas is not None:
num_elec_a = num_elec_b = int(nelecas / 2)
else:
num_elec_a, num_elec_b = nelecas
spin_sq = input_spin
# Convert counts into bitstring and probability arrays
bitstring_matrix_full, probs_arr_full = counts_to_arrays(counts_dict)
# We set qiskit_serverless to explicitly reserve 1 cpu per thread, as
# the task is CPU-bound and might degrade in performance when sharing
# a core at scale (this might not be the case with smaller examples)
@distribute_task(target={"cpu": 1})
def solve_solvent_parallel(
batches,
myeps,
mysolvmethod,
myavas,
num_orbitals,
spin_sq,
max_davidson,
checkpoint_file,
):
return solve_solvent( # sqd for pyscf
batches,
myeps,
mysolvmethod,
myavas,
num_orbitals,
spin_sq=spin_sq,
max_davidson=max_davidson,
checkpoint_file=checkpoint_file,
)
e_hist = np.zeros((iterations, n_batches)) # energy history
s_hist = np.zeros((iterations, n_batches)) # spin history
g_solv_hist = np.zeros((iterations, n_batches)) # g_solv history
occupancy_hist = []
avg_occupancy = None
num_ran_iter = 0
for i in range(iterations):
logger.info(f"Starting configuration recovery iteration {i}")
# On the first iteration, we have no orbital occupancy information from the
# solver, so we begin with the full set of noisy configurations.
if avg_occupancy is None:
bs_mat_tmp = bitstring_matrix_full
probs_arr_tmp = probs_arr_full
# If we have average orbital occupancy information, we use it to refine the full
# set of noisy configurations
else:
bs_mat_tmp, probs_arr_tmp = recover_configurations(
bitstring_matrix_full, probs_arr_full, avg_occupancy, num_elec_a, num_elec_b
)
# Create batches of subsamples. We post-select here to remove configurations
# with incorrect hamming weight during iteration 0, since no config recovery was performed.
batches = postselect_and_subsample(
bs_mat_tmp,
probs_arr_tmp,
hamming_right=num_elec_a,
hamming_left=num_elec_b,
samples_per_batch=samples_per_batch,
num_batches=n_batches,
)
# Run eigenstate solvers in a loop. This loop should be parallelized for larger problems.
e_tmp = np.zeros(n_batches)
s_tmp = np.zeros(n_batches)
g_solvs_tmp = np.zeros(n_batches)
occs_tmp = []
coeffs = []
res1 = []
for j in range(n_batches):
strs_a, strs_b = bitstring_matrix_to_ci_strs(batches[j])
logger.info(f"Batch {j} subspace dimension: {len(strs_a) * len(strs_b)}")
res1.append(
solve_solvent_parallel(
batches[j],
myeps,
mymethod,
myavas,
num_orbitals,
spin_sq=spin_sq,
max_davidson=max_davidson_cycles,
checkpoint_file=checkpoint_file_name,
)
)
res = get(res1)
for j in range(n_batches):
energy_sci, coeffs_sci, avg_occs, spin, g_solv = res[j]
e_tmp[j] = energy_sci
s_tmp[j] = spin
g_solvs_tmp[j] = g_solv
occs_tmp.append(avg_occs)
coeffs.append(coeffs_sci)
# Combine batch results
avg_occupancy = tuple(np.mean(occs_tmp, axis=0))
# Track optimization history
e_hist[i, :] = e_tmp
s_hist[i, :] = s_tmp
g_solv_hist[i, :] = g_solvs_tmp
occupancy_hist.append(avg_occupancy)
lowest_e_batch_index = np.argmin(e_hist[i, :])
logger.info(f"Lowest energy batch: {lowest_e_batch_index}")
logger.info(f"Lowest energy value: {np.min(e_hist[i, :])}")
logger.info(f"Corresponding g_solv value: {g_solv_hist[i, lowest_e_batch_index]}")
logger.info("-----------------------------------")
num_ran_iter += 1
end_pp = time.time()
end = time.time()
duration = end - start
logger.info(f"SCI_solver totally takes: {duration} seconds")
metadata = {
"resources_usage": {
"RUNNING: MAPPING": {
"CPU_TIME": end_mapping - start_mapping,
},
"RUNNING: OPTIMIZING_FOR_HARDWARE": {
"CPU_TIME": end_optimizing - start_optimizing,
},
"RUNNING: WAITING_FOR_QPU": {
"CPU_TIME": waiting_qpu_time,
},
"RUNNING: EXECUTING_QPU": {
"QPU_TIME": executing_qpu_time,
},
"RUNNING: POST_PROCESSING": {
"CPU_TIME": end_pp - start_pp,
},
},
"num_iterations_executed": num_ran_iter,
}
output = {
"total_energy_hist": e_hist,
"spin_squared_value_hist": s_hist,
"solvation_free_energy_hist": g_solv_hist,
"occupancy_hist": occupancy_hist,
"lowest_energy_batch": lowest_e_batch_index,
"lowest_energy_value": np.min(e_hist[i, :]),
"solvation_free_energy": g_solv_hist[i, lowest_e_batch_index],
"sci_solver_total_duration": duration,
"metadata": metadata,
}
return output
def set_up_logger(my_logger: logging.Logger, level: int = logging.INFO) -> None:
"""Logger setup to communicate logs through serverless."""
log_fmt = "%(module)s.%(funcName)s:%(levelname)s:%(asctime)s: %(message)s"
formatter = logging.Formatter(log_fmt)
# Set propagate to `False` since handlers are to be attached.
my_logger.propagate = False
stream_handler = logging.StreamHandler()
stream_handler.setFormatter(formatter)
my_logger.addHandler(stream_handler)
my_logger.setLevel(level)
# This is the section where `run_function` is called, it's boilerplate code and can be used
# without customization.
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Use serverless helper function to extract input arguments,
input_args = get_arguments()
# Allow to configure logging level
logging_level = input_args.get("logging_level", logging.INFO)
set_up_logger(logger, logging_level)
try:
func_result = run_function(**input_args)
# Use serverless function to save the results that
# will be returned in the job.
save_result(func_result)
except Exception:
save_result(traceback.format_exc())
raise
sys.exit(0)
# This cell is hidden from users. It verifies both source listings are identical then deletes the working folder we created
import shutil
with open("./source_files/sqd_pcm_entrypoint.py") as f1:
with open("./source_files/sqd_pcm_entrypoint.py") as f2:
assert f1.read() == f2.read()
with open("./source_files/solve_solvent.py") as f1:
with open("./source_files/solve_solvent.py") as f2:
assert f1.read() == f2.read()
with open("./source_files/__init__.py") as f1:
with open("./source_files/__init__.py") as f2:
assert f1.read() == f2.read()
shutil.rmtree("./source_files/")